090208 Dick Bond To Advise Tyson Foods
February 4, 2009
Springdale, AR (The Morning News) -- When Dick Bond resigned abruptly as
CEO of Tyson Foods Inc. on Jan. 5, industry analysts agreed the company was
losing a talented manager. A recent filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission indicates that Bond won't be far away should the company call.
Bond signed a lucrative 10-year advisory contract worth more than $9.2
million, excluding stock options and other perquisites such as the use of
corporate jets, a cell phone and a 2009 Mercedes-Benz, which is part of the
compensation package, according to Tyson spokesman Gary Mickelson.
The contract said the company could require Bond to provide up to 20
advisory hours per month, but he will not retain an office at the corporate
headquarters in Springdale.
Tyson Foods agreed to pay Bond $757,620 annually for the next five years,
and $378,810 for the remaining five years, in exchange for the possible advisory
services. The contract also prohibits Bond from sharing trade secrets or going
to work for competitors for 11 years.
Bond played a fairly high-risk game running this complicated company, said
Tim Ramey, analyst with D.A. Davidson & Co.
As CEO, Bond earned an annual base salary of $1.26 million last year, with
no performance bonus.
Ramey said the settlement appears to be the ultimate reward for his hard
work in recent years, even if the company has chosen a different management
approach.
Following Bond's departure, industry analysts surmised that the 61-year-old
Bond had likely fallen out of favor with the Tyson family, particularly with the
lackluster performance of the chicken segment. The Tyson family is the largest
shareholder and controls the majority vote, through a dual class share system.
Bond had previously been applauded across the industry for his cost-cutting
measures that returned the company's beef segment to profitability and the
expansion into the biofuel arena with joint ventures with ConocoPhillips and
Syntroleum.
When chicken went south and stayed there all year, Bond's days were likely
numbered, according to Ann Gilpin, analyst with Morningstar. She said his
unwillingness to cut chicken production was likely at odds with the direction
the Tyson family wanted to take the company.
Ironically, most of the damage had already been done in the poultry segment.
When Bond resigned, recovery was already underway as grain prices declined and
production cuts across the industry were beginning to prop up chicken prices,
according to Paul Aho, poultry economist with Poultry Perspective.
"I am not convinced the company is actually doing anything differently under
the new management. I don't think they have yet found the leadership to take the
company to the next big phase, whatever that is. It seems they are still resting
on the laurels of the Don Tyson years," Ramey said.
RETURN TO HOME PAGE
RETURN TO ARCHIVE PAGE