090114: Fellow Democrats Blast Obama's Pick for CIA Director
January 5, 2009
(QC Politics) -- The incoming and outgoing chairs of the Senate Intelligence
Committee signaled concerns about President-elect Barack Obama's choice of Leon E.
Panetta to head the CIA, primarily because of Panetta's thin intelligence resume.
"I was not informed about the selection of Leon Panetta. . . . I know nothing about this,
other than what I've read," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who will chair the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence in the 111th Congress, in an e-mailed statement. "My
position has consistently been that I believe the agency is best-served by having an
intelligence professional in charge at this time."
Added an aide to Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., who served as chairman of
the committee in the 110th Congress: "I think, based on press reporting if it proves
correct, Sen. Rockefeller has some concerns about his selection. Not because he has any
concerns about Panetta, whom he thinks very highly of, but because he has no
intelligence experience and because he has believed this has always been a position that
should be outside of the political realm."
Though Panetta has no significant prior experience in intelligence matters, his selection
continues a trend that has seen Obama select seasoned Clinton administration veterans
known more for their Washington savvy than their partisan tendencies. But his service
high in the ranks of the White House also could raise concerns about his policy views.
Clinton and his predecessor, President George Bush, began to cut intelligence agency
budgets in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War, although counterterrorism funding
rose under Clinton.
Christopher S. Bond, R-Mo., vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
questioned the choice.
"Job No. 1 at the CIA is to track down and stop terrorists," Bond said in a statement.
"In a post-9/11 world, intelligence experience would seem to be a prerequisite for the job
of CIA director.
"While I will reserve final judgment on President-elect Obama's nomination for the
leader of our terror-fighting agency, I will be looking hard at Panetta's intelligence
expertise and qualifications."
Despite his thin resume on intelligence issues, Panetta has written and spoken on a
number of issues pertinent to the work of spies as well as to concerns by liberals that
some potential CIA choices were too closely aligned with Bush administration stances on
interrogation policy and warrantless surveillance.
In August, he penned a piece for Washington Monthly headlined "No Torture. No
Exceptions." It concluded: "We cannot and must not use torture under any circumstances.
We are better than that."
In July 2006, he wrote critically in the Monterey County (Calif.) Herald about the Bush
administration's interpretations of the law in the war on terrorism. "Under this
interpretation, statutes prohibiting torture, secret detentions and warrantless surveillance
have been set aside," Panetta wrote.
Rep. Rush D. Holt, D-N.J., chairman of the House Intelligence Oversight
Subcommittee, said those kinds of views are exactly what the CIA needs. "Having served
in Congress in the wake of Watergate and the domestic surveillance abuses that surfaced
during the 1970s, Mr. Panetta understands how a democratic government should operate.
. . . Mr. Panetta's background and reputation indicate he would serve the intelligence
community, the president, and the country well," Holt said in a statement.
Panetta was elected nine times to the House and was the Budget Committee chairman
from 1989 to 1993. He was selected by President Bill Clinton to head the Office of
Management and Budget in 1993. He was appointed White House chief of staff in July
1994 and left for the private sector in 1997. In the post-Clinton years, Panetta has served
in a variety of roles, including as a member of the Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan
committee that called on the Bush administration to hand off the combat mission to the
Iraqis, bolster diplomatic efforts in the region and pave the way for a drawdown of troops
by spring 2008.
Former Rep. Lee H. Hamilton, D-Ind., who served with him on the Iraq Study Group,
praised Panetta's qualifications.
"First of all, he's certainly dealt with a lot of intelligence," said Hamilton, an Obama
ally. "In the Iraq Study Group we dealt with it every day. As chief of staff in the White
House, you deal with it every day, too."
Hamilton said Panetta would need top deputies from the intelligence community. "It's a
complicated, arcane business," he noted. But he added, "What his strength will be is he
brings an outsider's perspective to the intelligence community."
Following a stint in the Army from 1963 to 1965, Panetta came to Washington as a
legislative assistant to then California GOP Sen. Thomas Henry Kuchel (1953-1969). He
was director of the Office of Civil Rights within the Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare (now the Department of Health and Human Services) from 1969 to 1970 and
also served as executive assistant to the mayor of New York before running for Congress.
RETURN TO NEWS PAGE
RETURN TO HOME PAGE